Edit README.md

README.md

@@ -226,13 +226,13 @@ The results were visually appealing and imaginative, showcasing the model's capa
 **Example Results from Stable Diffusion 3.5:**
 
 ![Stable Diffusion 3.5 Result 1](images/generated1.jpeg)  
-*Underwater wheeled bee*
+*Underwater wheeled bee from large model*
 
 ![Stable Diffusion 3.5 Result 2](images/generated2.jpeg)  
-*Monster buys lollipop*
+*Monster buys lollipop from large model*
 
 ![Stable Diffusion 3.5 Result 3](images/generated3.jpeg)  
-*Imagine a world without eggs*
+*Imagine a world without eggs from large model*
 
 ### Smaller Model: OFA-Sys Small-Stable-Diffusion
 While the smaller model generated images, the quality and creativity were noticeably lower. The images lacked the detail and originality seen with the larger model, confirming that smaller models are less capable of handling complex, creative prompts.
@@ -240,13 +240,13 @@ While the smaller model generated images, the quality and creativity were notice
 **Example Results from OFA-Sys Small-Stable-Diffusion:**
 
 ![OFA-Sys Small Result 1](images/not_as_good_generated_image1.png)  
-*Example result 1 from smaller model*
+*Underwater wheeled bee from smaller model*
 
 ![OFA-Sys Small Result 2](images/not_as_good_generated_image2.png)  
-*Example result 2 from smaller model*
+*Monster buys lollipop from smaller model*
 
 ![OFA-Sys Small Result 2](images/not_as_good_generated_image3.png)  
-*Example result 3 from smaller model*
+*Imagine a world without eggs from smaller model*
 
 ### Conclusion
 The experiment demonstrates that larger models, like Stable Diffusion 3.5, produce superior image quality and creativity. However, smaller models can still be useful in scenarios with hardware limitations, though they fall short in terms of detail and imagination when compared to their larger counterparts.